Comments on: What does a lawyer try and get guilty people off the hook and free again to murder other people? http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:52:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Drixnot http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1910 Drixnot Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:42:56 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1910 De reden alle verdachte criminelen krijgen advocaten is te voorkomen dat onschuldige mensen uit naar de gevangenis. Voor elke onschuldige man naar de gevangenis is er een echte criminele rondlopen gratis. De reden alle verdachte criminelen krijgen advocaten is te voorkomen dat onschuldige mensen uit naar de gevangenis. Voor elke onschuldige man naar de gevangenis is er een echte criminele rondlopen gratis.

]]> By: Thomas T http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1909 Thomas T Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:38:54 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1909 Ongeacht de weerzinwekkende aard van de misdaad, de basis van het het strafrechtsysteem van de V.S. basisbescherming voor WIJ ALLEMAAL van een vermoeden van onschuld, gepast proces, bewijslast boven een redelijke twijfel voor elk element van de inbreuk, het recht omvat te adviseren, het recht op een eerlijke proef, en het recht een beroep te doen. Niettemin zou het voor de advocaat verkeerd zijn te zeggen zijn cliënt &quot was; innocent" toen allen hij behoorlijk kon zeggen is dat zijn cliënt &quot is; niet guilty" welke een reusachtig verschil is. De advocaat is verondersteld om de RECHTEN van beschuldigd te beschermen; het zou voor de advocaat verkeerd en doend walgen zijn om rechtvaardiging voor gedrag te bepleiten waarvoor er niets zijn. Ongeacht de weerzinwekkende aard van de misdaad, de basis van het het strafrechtsysteem van de V.S. basisbescherming voor WIJ ALLEMAAL van een vermoeden van onschuld, gepast proces, bewijslast boven een redelijke twijfel voor elk element van de inbreuk, het recht omvat te adviseren, het recht op een eerlijke proef, en het recht een beroep te doen. Niettemin zou het voor de advocaat verkeerd zijn te zeggen zijn cliënt &quot was; innocent" toen allen hij behoorlijk kon zeggen is dat zijn cliënt &quot is; niet guilty" welke een reusachtig verschil is. De advocaat is verondersteld om de RECHTEN van beschuldigd te beschermen; het zou voor de advocaat verkeerd en doend walgen zijn om rechtvaardiging voor gedrag te bepleiten waarvoor er niets zijn.

]]> By: bkc99xx http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1908 bkc99xx Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:11:24 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1908 Look, understanding criminal defense is hard for most of us to do. We see certain cases and we know, or at least think we do, that the person is guilty. However, remember that justice is blind. It must allow for a defense of all cases, no matter how terrible the circumstances. Otherwise, we would be drawing the line that said when enough people reading about a crime believed that the person had committed it, then they would no longer deserve a trial. Therefore, trials such as this where we certainly believe the right person is on trial are necessary to protect the next innocent person down the line that is accused but is actually innocent. All people are guaranteed a trial that should be exhaustive enough to prove that the crime was committed by that person. It does seem that a lot of time could be saved in so many cases, but who gets to decide which cases are automatic and which ones aren't? Look, understanding criminal defense is hard for most of us to do. We see certain cases and we know, or at least think we do, that the person is guilty. However, remember that justice is blind. It must allow for a defense of all cases, no matter how terrible the circumstances. Otherwise, we would be drawing the line that said when enough people reading about a crime believed that the person had committed it, then they would no longer deserve a trial. Therefore, trials such as this where we certainly believe the right person is on trial are necessary to protect the next innocent person down the line that is accused but is actually innocent. All people are guaranteed a trial that should be exhaustive enough to prove that the crime was committed by that person. It does seem that a lot of time could be saved in so many cases, but who gets to decide which cases are automatic and which ones aren’t?

]]> By: rickinnocal http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1907 rickinnocal Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:43:03 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1907 And on WHAT do you base your belief that the guy is NOT innocent? Do you believe we should do away with trials and just assume that anyone the police accuse of a crime is guilty and should be punished accordingly? Do you honestly believe that everyone convicted of a crime really did it? If so, I have some wonderful ocean-front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you cheap. Go to to read about HUNDREDS of people released from prison, sometimes years later, after being proven to be innocent of the crimes they were convicted of. Edit... "it would be wrong for the lawyer to say his client was "innocent"...." Wrong. If the lawyer actually believes that his client is innocent - which is not the same as "they can't prove he's guilty" - then it is completely ethical for him to say so. Richard And on WHAT do you base your belief that the guy is NOT innocent?

Do you believe we should do away with trials and just assume that anyone the police accuse of a crime is guilty and should be punished accordingly?

Do you honestly believe that everyone convicted of a crime really did it? If so, I have some wonderful ocean-front property in Arizona I’d like to sell you cheap.

Go to to read about HUNDREDS of people released from prison, sometimes years later, after being proven to be innocent of the crimes they were convicted of.

Edit… “it would be wrong for the lawyer to say his client was “innocent”….”

Wrong. If the lawyer actually believes that his client is innocent - which is not the same as “they can’t prove he’s guilty” - then it is completely ethical for him to say so.

Richard

]]> By: spudzey http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1906 spudzey Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:10:45 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1906 Nazywają się one obrony warstw i to ich zadanie, w przeciwieństwie do prokuratorów. Nazywają się one obrony warstw i to ich zadanie, w przeciwieństwie do prokuratorów.

]]> By: Love Canada http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1905 Love Canada Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:24:50 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1905 Because that is how justice works!! Someday you may need that system to save you if your innocent Because that is how justice works!!
Someday you may need that system to save you if your innocent

]]> By: Watchful Occupier http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1904 Watchful Occupier Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:48:08 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1904 Er hat keine Wahl. Das ist das, was er zu tun hätten. Er konnte sich nicht für ausgeschlossen verteidigen ihn. Er hat keine Wahl. Das ist das, was er zu tun hätten. Er konnte sich nicht für ausgeschlossen verteidigen ihn.

]]> By: bob k http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1903 bob k Sat, 28 Mar 2009 07:12:02 +0000 http://www.legaldot.net/blog/what-does-a-lawyer-try-and-get-guilty-people-off-the-hook-and-free-again-to-murder-other-people/#comment-1903 Every one has a right to an attorney and is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Every one has a right to an attorney and is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

]]>